tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19606253.post115984065652501347..comments2023-11-03T02:19:04.895+13:00Comments on attempting abandonment: Army Stufflucy arhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05853654737119450492noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19606253.post-1159929833808020582006-10-04T15:43:00.000+13:002006-10-04T15:43:00.000+13:00Yeah. Me too, Jo. My doubts about the Army are mas...Yeah. Me too, Jo. My doubts about the Army are massive. I have continous inner dialogue- one part of me believing structural and cultural change can happen. The other bit of me contends that actually, very important people have been seriously questioning our structure and culture for over half a century... so is there any genuine hope for reform?<BR/><BR/>Even if there is hope for reform I think a bit of a heavy repenting and grieving time is quite neccesary. But will this happen while people stay quiet, while we - as you Tim put so well- tiptoe around the truths?lucy arhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05853654737119450492noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19606253.post-1159873683941658852006-10-04T00:08:00.000+13:002006-10-04T00:08:00.000+13:00“I think our Army needs a total reform of structur...“I think our Army needs a total reform of structure and culture.”<BR/><BR/>There are some things that many of us think, but are afraid to say. Diplomacy is needed and, because of that, we hold a lot in. For me it’s the idea that the so-called “traditional church” will not last. For the most part, “traditional churches” are dwindling in numbers. In addition to that, our world has truly changed in its approach to friendships and community, its acceptance of all manner of spirituality, and its ability to customize everything to meet any particular need. To me, everything we see, hear, can study, and know suggests that the “traditional way of doing church” is dying and cannot last. Yet many cling to it and the rest of us are expected to pretend that it is not, in fact, dying a rather quick and brutal death. While I believe in sensitivity, I also think it is ridiculous that we continue to tiptoe around this truth. <BR/><BR/>The structure of TSA is, for me, becoming another one of those topics. Salvationists would be up in arms to hear their church compared to the catholic church, yet we have a pope, cardinals, bishops, etc. We are a church, run from the top down, often by people who haven’t been on the front lines of ministry, or outside of TSA bubble, in decades. The General has the power to make sweeping changes, or no changes at all, without even consulting other leaders. And, to hold this man to account, a third of our highest ranking leaders must agree to even having a discussion about it at all. <BR/><BR/>In my own division, the majority of our “members” do not relate or even consider themselves to be a part of this global organization that we call TSA. In fact, one of our greatest struggles in raising up official “soldiers” is simply the fact that, while people are excited about committing to a local congregation, they have serious reservations about identifying with a global organization that they have no say in. Furthermore, I’m not sure that the one hundred or so leaders of our organization, who make our most important decisions, reflect much of what is happening here locally. More and more Corps are practicing things like baptism and communion, yet our top leader just announced that the topics will not even be discussed as long as he is in charge. <BR/><BR/>In many ways it often seems that those at the top are merely playing Salvation Army, while those locally are actually doing it. I’m with you, our church definitely needs a total reform of both structure and, without a doubt, culture.Timhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17540955462013524502noreply@blogger.com